Skip to main content
BilgeQor
Back to industries

CTO, IT Director

Construction & Project Platforms

Verified Taiwan data

Market-level figure, not a per-company loss estimate.

NT$237.05m daily loss

Average daily scam financial loss in August 2025

Official source:
National Police Agency / Criminal Investigation Bureau via Executive Yuan file
Period:
August 2025
Scope note:
Official 165 Anti-Fraud Dashboard monthly average. Market-level reported financial loss, not a per-company estimate.

35% information collection / 34% intrusion attacks / 20% intrusion attempts

Identifiable threat mix in May 2025 joint-defense intelligence

Official source:
MODA Administration for Cyber Security
Period:
May 2025
Scope note:
Threat-mix context. Use to explain scanning, intrusion and social engineering exposure.

8.727bn transactions / NT$8.74tn amount

Non-cash payment transaction volume and amount in 2025

Official source:
Financial Supervisory Commission
Period:
2025
Scope note:
Official payment-activity indicator. Use for payment surface exposure, not breach or fraud loss.

Likely loss areas

  • invoice redirection and payment dispute
  • subcontractor portal access misuse
  • project document leakage
  • supplier chain trust and delivery delay

Structured support changes the outcome

Visibility

With structured support

Key digital surfaces, payment flows, admin roles and external dependencies are mapped before an incident forces discovery.

Without structured support

Risks are often found only after fraud reports, user complaints, vendor review pressure or service disruption.

Prioritisation

With structured support

Security work is translated into business impact, owner, urgency and a practical remediation sequence.

Without structured support

Findings stay scattered across tools, vendors and teams, so high-impact issues may remain unresolved.

Evidence

With structured support

Leadership receives a concise security file with official market context, risk notes and follow-through actions.

Without structured support

Management may lack a clear record when customers, partners or regulators ask what was reviewed.

Incident readiness

With structured support

Access, logs, backups, vendor contacts and response priorities are prepared before a crisis.

Without structured support

Response starts under pressure, often while access ownership, evidence and communications are unclear.

Cost control

With structured support

Preventive work becomes budgetable and staged by risk.

Without structured support

Costs surface later as emergency remediation, lost time, fraud operations load or trust recovery.

BilgeQor Method

01

Market and sector evidence

Use official Taiwan fraud, payment and cybersecurity signals to frame risk without exaggerating it.

02

Exposure mapping

Map customer-facing flows, payment journeys, admin access, APIs, vendors and public forms.

03

Impact analysis

Translate findings into likely financial, operational, trust, data and partner-review impact.

04

Security file delivery

Deliver an executive-ready file with verified context, priority risks and remediation notes.

05

Follow-through

Keep risk visible through retest, advisory cadence or a focused implementation path.