Skip to main content
BilgeQor

Verified Singapore data

Official, market-level Singapore data — reported figures, not per-company loss estimates.

Reported scam losses

S$913.1m

Total reported scam losses in Singapore

Official source:
Singapore Police Force — Annual Scam and Cybercrime Brief 2025
Timeframe:
2025
Scope note:
Official Singapore scam-loss data; market context only, not a per-company loss estimate.

Banking & Financial Services share of spoofed-industry phishing

56%

Banking and Financial Services share of spoofed-industry phishing attempts

Official source:
Cyber Security Agency of Singapore — Singapore Cyber Landscape 2024/2025
Timeframe:
2024
Scope note:
Use for financial services, fintech, payments and customer-authentication risk context.

Phishing scam cases and losses

6,264 cases · S$39.9m

Reported phishing scam cases and losses, including unauthorised card transactions after victims shared card details, passwords, OTPs or digital tokens

Official source:
Singapore Police Force — Annual Scam and Cybercrime Brief 2025
Timeframe:
2025
Scope note:
Use for authentication, payment, portal and account-takeover risk context.

Investment scam losses

S$336.2m

Reported investment scam losses

Official source:
Singapore Police Force — Annual Scam and Cybercrime Brief 2025
Timeframe:
2025
Scope note:
Use for financial services, fintech, real estate and investment-platform risk context.

Likely loss areas

Mobile banking, internet banking portals, card flows, digital tokens, customer authentication, advisory journeys, and impersonation risk need disciplined evidence and recurring control checks.

What structured security support changes

Area

Risk visibility

With structured support

Critical digital surfaces, access paths, payment and data flows, and vendor dependencies are reviewed on a recurring basis.

Without structured support

Risk is often discovered after a customer complaint, failed vendor review, suspicious transaction, downtime event or incident.

Area

Payment and fraud exposure

With structured support

Authentication, payment redirection, invoice workflows, API journeys and customer account flows are mapped to likely fraud paths.

Without structured support

Fraud exposure can remain hidden inside checkout, email, portal, mobile or admin workflows until loss or trust damage occurs.

Area

Evidence for partners and leadership

With structured support

The organisation keeps a clearer security file with executive summary, prioritised risks, remediation notes and follow-up decisions.

Without structured support

Security answers become reactive during procurement, regulator questions, investor diligence, partner reviews or post-incident communications.

Area

Incident readiness

With structured support

Access ownership, logs, backups, recovery priorities and communication paths are easier to confirm before an incident escalates.

Without structured support

Teams may lose time identifying owners, systems, vendors, evidence and recovery priorities during a stressful event.

Area

Cost discipline

With structured support

Remediation can be sequenced by business impact and budgeted as a planned security activity.

Without structured support

Work is often done under pressure, with higher uncertainty, rushed decisions and wider business disruption.

BilgeQor Method

We turn market evidence, sector exposure and technical findings into a security file leadership can act on.

01

Market & sector research

We connect official Singapore data with the digital workflows that matter for the sector.

02

Exposure mapping

We map portals, apps, payment flows, APIs, admin paths, vendors and customer data touchpoints.

03

Impact analysis

We rank findings by operational, financial, trust, regulatory and delivery impact — not only technical severity.

04

Security file delivery

We deliver an executive summary, prioritised risks, remediation notes and a practical follow-through path.