Skip to main content
BilgeQor
Back to industries

CTO, VP Engineering

Logistics, Travel & Hospitality

Digital surfaces

Booking Engines
Fleet Dashboards
Customer Apps

Threat themes

  • API Scraping
  • Payment Fraud
  • Service Disruption

Verified Indonesia industry data

Official Indonesia data, shown as market-level context — not per-company loss estimates.

QRIS transaction volume and value

6.05bn transactions · IDR579tn

QRIS transaction volume and total value.

Official source:
Bank Indonesia — QRIS Jelajah Indonesia 2025
Timeframe:
Semester I 2025
Scope note:
Payment-volume context; not a loss figure.

Digital payment transaction volume

12.99bn transactions · +38.08% YoY

Digital payment transaction volume and year-on-year growth.

Official source:
Bank Indonesia — FEKDI x IFSE 2025 press release
Timeframe:
Q3 2025
Scope note:
Payment volume context for mobile banking, wallets and commerce.

National cyber anomaly traffic

330,527,636 anomaly events

National cyber anomaly traffic events recorded by BSSN / ID-SIRTII.

Official source:
BSSN / ID-SIRTII/CC — Lanskap Keamanan Siber Indonesia 2024
Timeframe:
2024
Scope note:
Threat telemetry; not a successful breach count.

PDNS ransomware disruption

Serious PDNS ransomware disruption

Serious ransomware disruption affecting PDNS.

Official source:
Kementerian Komunikasi dan Digital — Laporan Kinerja 2024
Timeframe:
2024
Scope note:
Public-service disruption context; not a claim about all public systems.

Likely loss areas

Booking engines, fleet dashboards, travel documents, QRIS/payment flows, supplier portals, loyalty accounts and availability-sensitive systems need regular checks against fraud and disruption.

What structured security support changes

Dimension

Visibility

With structured support

Critical surfaces, access paths, payment flows, customer data and vendor dependencies are mapped before they become an incident.

Without structured support

Risk is often discovered after a fraud report, blocked account, service disruption, customer complaint or partner security review.

Dimension

Prioritisation

With structured support

Findings are translated into a business-prioritised roadmap, so urgent access, payment, backup and logging issues are handled first.

Without structured support

Technical issues stay scattered across teams; fixes compete with product work without a clear impact view.

Dimension

Evidence

With structured support

A security file, executive summary, remediation notes and follow-up record make security easier to explain to leadership, partners and buyers.

Without structured support

The organisation may rely on informal assurance and screenshots when customers, banks, partners or regulators ask difficult questions.

Dimension

Incident readiness

With structured support

Logging, access ownership, backup expectations and response paths are checked before a fraud, ransomware or service-disruption event escalates.

Without structured support

Response is slower because account ownership, vendor access, logs, backups and communication responsibilities are unclear.

Dimension

Cost exposure

With structured support

Preventive work becomes budgetable and tied to official market risk signals instead of vague fear.

Without structured support

Cost often appears during a crisis: lost transactions, blocked accounts, recovery work, customer trust loss and rushed remediation.

BilgeQor Method

For Indonesia, BilgeQor turns official market signals into a practical security file: what is exposed, what could create business impact, and what should be handled first.

01

Market and sector evidence

We start with official Indonesia data from OJK, IASC, Bank Indonesia, BSSN / ID-SIRTII, Kominfo-CSIRT, Komdigi, Polri and BPS where relevant.

02

Exposure mapping

We map payment flows, customer portals, mobile apps, APIs, admin roles, cloud storage, vendor access and public-facing forms.

03

Impact framing

We connect each risk to practical loss areas: fraud handling, blocked accounts, downtime, customer trust, partner review, recovery cost and remediation pressure.

04

Security file delivery

We deliver a structured executive summary, prioritised findings, remediation notes and a 14/30/90-day action path where appropriate.

05

Follow-through

One-off reviews can become monthly advisory, retesting, hardening or launch-readiness work when the team needs continued support.

The method does not guarantee prevention, recovery, compliance or regulator approval. It creates clearer security decisions using verified evidence and a maintained delivery record.